Accessibility Audit Report

WCAG 2.2 Level AA · 1 page scanned · 26-Aug-2026

Download PDF
85%CHECKS PASSED

16 issues found across 1 page, checked against WCAG 2.2 Level AA.

22 of 26 automated checks passed.

8
Critical
⚠
Immediate attention needed
8
High
!
Should be addressed
0
Medium
−
Consider improvements
0
Low
✓
Minor issues
⚠ Compliance at risk. We found 8 critical issues that block some people from using these pages at all. In this state the site would likely fail an ADA Title II or Section 508 review.

What this means for your visitors

Around 1 in 5 people has a disability that can affect how they use a website. On the pages we scanned, some of them cannot complete key tasks today — they will leave, and you will never see it in your analytics as anything other than a bounce.

Where the issues are

Number of individual problems found in each area, across every page scanned.

Labels & Screen Readers10Keyboard Access5Page Structure1

⚡ Priority action plan

Start here. These are the highest-impact fixes across the pages we scanned.

  1. 1Buttons don't say what they do (8 places)Critical
  2. 2There's no visible focus indicator (5 places)High
  3. 3Links don't say where they go (2 places)High
  4. 4Lists are built incorrectlyHigh

Fixing these clears 4 of your 4 most serious issue types.

Want these fixed?

Our team can remediate all 16 issues and re-audit to confirm you're compliant.

Book a free consultation

Results by category

Every automated check we ran, grouped by the part of the experience it affects. A category passes only when every check in it passed on every page scanned.

Images & MediaPassed
3 of 3 checks passed

Images, icons, audio and video have text alternatives so they still make sense to someone who can't see or hear them.

  • ✓Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation
  • ✓Images must have alternative text
  • ✓All touch targets must be 24px large, or leave sufficient space
Colour & ContrastPassed
1 of 1 checks passed

Text stands out enough from its background to stay readable in poor light or with reduced vision.

  • ✓Elements must meet minimum color contrast ratio thresholds
Forms & InputsPassed
2 of 2 checks passed

Every field is clearly labelled, so people know what to type and screen readers can announce it.

  • ✓Form field must not have multiple label elements
  • ✓Form elements must have labels
Keyboard AccessNeeds attention
3 of 4 checks passed

The whole page can be operated with a keyboard alone, without getting stuck, and the focused item is always visible.

  • ✗No visible focus indicator (outline/box-shadow) on keyboard focus (5 places)High2.4.7
  • ✓Page must have means to bypass repeated blocks
  • ✓Interactive controls must not be nested
  • ✓Scrollable region must have keyboard access
Page StructureNeeds attention
3 of 4 checks passed

Headings, landmarks and lists are used properly, so assistive tech can navigate the page in a sensible order.

  • ✗<ul> and <ol> must only directly contain <li>, <script> or <template> elementsHigh1.3.1
  • ✓Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets
  • ✓IDs used in ARIA and labels must be unique
  • ✓<li> elements must be contained in a <ul> or <ol>
Labels & Screen ReadersNeeds attention
7 of 9 checks passed

Buttons, links and controls have names that describe what they do when read aloud.

  • ✗Buttons must have discernible text (8 places)Critical4.1.2
  • ✗Links must have discernible text (2 places)High2.4.4,4.1.2
  • ✓Elements must only use supported ARIA attributes
  • ✓ARIA attributes must be used as specified for the element's role
  • ✓aria-hidden="true" must not be present on the document body
  • ✓ARIA hidden element must not be focusable or contain focusable elements
  • ✓Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes
  • +2 more checks passed
LanguagePassed
2 of 2 checks passed

The page declares its language so screen readers use the right pronunciation.

  • ✓<html> element must have a lang attribute
  • ✓<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute
Mobile & ZoomPassed
1 of 1 checks passed

Content reflows and stays usable when zoomed in or viewed on a small screen.

  • ✓Zooming and scaling must not be disabled

Full breakdown

Every issue we found, worst first — what it is, who it affects, and what fixes it.

IssueSeverityPagesBusiness ImpactRecommendation
Buttons don't say what they do
Labels & Screen Readers · button-name · WCAG 4.1.2 · 8 places
Critical1These buttons are announced with no name. A customer using a screen reader cannot tell what the button does — if it is "Add to cart" or "Submit", the journey ends here.Give the button visible text, or an aria-label/aria-labelledby/title describing what it does — icon-only buttons need an accessible name.
There's no visible focus indicator
Keyboard Access · focus-visible · WCAG 2.4.7 · 5 places
High1There is no visible focus indicator, so keyboard users cannot see where they are on the page. Navigating becomes guesswork.Don't remove the default focus outline (outline:none) without replacing it — add a visible :focus-visible style (outline or box-shadow) with enough contrast against the background.
Lists are built incorrectly
Page Structure · list · WCAG 1.3.1
High1Lists are malformed, so screen readers may not announce how many items there are — which matters for product lists, features and steps.Make sure <ul>/<ol> elements only contain <li> children (move any other markup outside the list, or into an <li>).
Links don't say where they go
Labels & Screen Readers · link-name · WCAG 2.4.4,4.1.2 · 2 places
High1Screen readers announce these links as "link" with no destination. Customers navigating by links alone cannot tell where any of them go, so they stop.Give the link visible, non-empty text, or add aria-label/aria-labelledby describing its destination — icon-only or image-only links need an accessible name.

Pages scanned

  • Drupal & WordPress CMS Engineering | Digital Growth Partner | BinaryWorkshttps://thebinaryworks.com16 issues
91 items need a human check. Some things software genuinely cannot judge — whether text over a photograph is readable, or whether a custom component behaves the way it claims to. These are excluded from the counts above rather than guessed at. A manual review is the only way to settle them.
Report generated on 26-Aug-2026 · Scanned with axe-core against WCAG 2.2 Level AA Based on automated scanning. Guidance to help prioritise remediation, not a legal determination.